|
| Privacy Impact Assessment | The Data Protection Commissioner cannot give a general approval or disapprobation of biometric systems. Each system must be evaluated in respect of the situation in which it is used. A case-by-case judgment is required. With that in mind, the Commissioner encourages employers to take the above guidance into consideration before introducing any biometric system.
Before an employer installs a biometric system, the Data Protection Commissioner recommends carrying out a documented privacy impact assessment. An employer who properly conducts such an assessment is less likely to introduce a system that contradicts the provisions of the Data Protection Acts 1988 & 2003. This is an important procedure to adopt as a violation may result in action against an employer taking by the Commissioner. Or it may expose an employer to a claim for damages from an employee.
Some of the points that might be included in a Privacy Impact Assessment are:
• Do I have a time management and/or access control system in place? • Why do I feel I need to replace it? • What problems are there with the system? • Are these problems a result of poor administration of the system or an inherent design problem? • Have I examined a number of types of system that are available? • Will the non-biometric systems perform the required tasks adequately? • Do I need a biometric system? • If so, why kind do I need? • Do I need a system that identifies employees as opposed to a verification system? • Do I need a central database? • If so, what is wrong with a system that does not use a central database? • What is the biometric system required to achieve for me? • Is it for time management purposes and/or for access control purposes? • How accurate shall the data be? • What procedures are used to ensure accuracy of data? • Will the data require updating? • What constitutes an abuse of the system by an employee? • What procedures shall I put in place to deal with abuse? • What legal basis do I have for requiring employees to participate? • How will the information on it be secured? • Who shall have access to the data or to logs? • Why, when and how shall such access be permitted? • Does the system used employ additional identifiers (e.g. PIN number, smart card) along with the biometric? • If so, would these additional identifiers be sufficient on their own, rather than requiring operation in conjunction with a biometric? • How shall I inform employees about the system? • What information about the system need I provide to employees? • Would I be happy if I was an employee asked to use such a system?
|
|